<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This week&#8217;s header image on le craic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lecraic.com/2010/02/14/this-weeks-header-image-on-le-craic-65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2010/02/14/this-weeks-header-image-on-le-craic-65/</link>
	<description>craic from ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ursula</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2010/02/14/this-weeks-header-image-on-le-craic-65/comment-page-1/#comment-29056</link>
		<dc:creator>Ursula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=2614#comment-29056</guid>
		<description>AJ, I am clearly limping behind the times: I missed your Valentine week&#039;s header.

To illustrate your point: When I was little there were two types of butter in our house (for reasons of economy). One, with a certain amount of disdain, was called &quot;butter&quot; (to call it margarine being rather common), the other was called &quot;good butter&quot;, ie the real thing.

What is so annoying how many a customer is being led up some unscientific garden path by promises of buying the &#039;healthy&#039; alternative; making the greedy feel better about STILL stuffing their faces. Read the back of some packaging, also known as the ingredients list: The REAL thing being replaced by food labs with an array of rather interesting if somewhat alarming sounding add-ons which is enough to make me immediately lose my appetite and put it back on the shelf.

As you say: Either indulge in the real thing or chew on a carrot.

U</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ, I am clearly limping behind the times: I missed your Valentine week&#8217;s header.</p>
<p>To illustrate your point: When I was little there were two types of butter in our house (for reasons of economy). One, with a certain amount of disdain, was called &#8220;butter&#8221; (to call it margarine being rather common), the other was called &#8220;good butter&#8221;, ie the real thing.</p>
<p>What is so annoying how many a customer is being led up some unscientific garden path by promises of buying the &#8216;healthy&#8217; alternative; making the greedy feel better about STILL stuffing their faces. Read the back of some packaging, also known as the ingredients list: The REAL thing being replaced by food labs with an array of rather interesting if somewhat alarming sounding add-ons which is enough to make me immediately lose my appetite and put it back on the shelf.</p>
<p>As you say: Either indulge in the real thing or chew on a carrot.</p>
<p>U</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

