<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear RTE, enough of the lifestyle programmes already</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/</link>
	<description>craic from ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj@lecraic</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>aj@lecraic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll check out the comments thing for you, I have the same problem myself with other blogs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll check out the comments thing for you, I have the same problem myself with other blogs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-204</guid>
		<description>i did think you were getting at something, i wasn&#039;t sure what though (it wasn&#039;t a rhetorical question or a rebuke, is what i mean!). probably more my paranoia about how women are depicted in the media than any paranoia on your part.

on an unrelated note, is there a way to subscribe to the comments on your posts? i keep forgetting which ones i&#039;ve chimed in on and then i arrive back to conversations (such as this one) long after my train of thought has left the station...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i did think you were getting at something, i wasn&#8217;t sure what though (it wasn&#8217;t a rhetorical question or a rebuke, is what i mean!). probably more my paranoia about how women are depicted in the media than any paranoia on your part.</p>
<p>on an unrelated note, is there a way to subscribe to the comments on your posts? i keep forgetting which ones i&#8217;ve chimed in on and then i arrive back to conversations (such as this one) long after my train of thought has left the station&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj@lecraic</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>aj@lecraic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t getting at anything Rosie. I was quoting the blurb from the Business Post. Using the photo from the Sunday World was just to illustrate the point of participants being publicity hungry. If she&#039;d been described as &#039;Company Director Lynette&#039; or &#039;Hospital Consultant Lynette&#039;, I&#039;d have used that as a description and still used the Sunday World photos to illustrate my point. What did you think I was getting at because I honestly don&#039;t know and I&#039;m assuming you did think I was getting at something? or maybe you&#039;ve made me paranoid now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t getting at anything Rosie. I was quoting the blurb from the Business Post. Using the photo from the Sunday World was just to illustrate the point of participants being publicity hungry. If she&#8217;d been described as &#8216;Company Director Lynette&#8217; or &#8216;Hospital Consultant Lynette&#8217;, I&#8217;d have used that as a description and still used the Sunday World photos to illustrate my point. What did you think I was getting at because I honestly don&#8217;t know and I&#8217;m assuming you did think I was getting at something? or maybe you&#8217;ve made me paranoid now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-133</guid>
		<description>interesting that you made a point of illustrating the disparity between ‘Single mother Lynette’ in the promo shot and her spread in the Sunday World (pun intended). what were you getting at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting that you made a point of illustrating the disparity between ‘Single mother Lynette’ in the promo shot and her spread in the Sunday World (pun intended). what were you getting at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Groves</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Groves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I had been working on a rant (sorry, considered article) on the property shows in particular and you&#039;ve indirectly helped to focus my mind. The fact that one of the Beeb&#039;s shows I&#039;d been following is now postponed to accommodate the snooker also helps.
It is a chicken and egg question - do our aspirations fuel TV, or does TV fuel our aspirations?
No easy answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been working on a rant (sorry, considered article) on the property shows in particular and you&#8217;ve indirectly helped to focus my mind. The fact that one of the Beeb&#8217;s shows I&#8217;d been following is now postponed to accommodate the snooker also helps.<br />
It is a chicken and egg question &#8211; do our aspirations fuel TV, or does TV fuel our aspirations?<br />
No easy answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj@lecraic</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>aj@lecraic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis Paul - it&#039;s all catering to Status Anxiety - was that made up by Alan de Bottoin (think that&#039;s his name) - but it&#039;s very real and fuelled by a lot of those programmes you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis Paul &#8211; it&#8217;s all catering to Status Anxiety &#8211; was that made up by Alan de Bottoin (think that&#8217;s his name) &#8211; but it&#8217;s very real and fuelled by a lot of those programmes you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Groves</title>
		<link>http://www.lecraic.com/2008/04/21/dear-rte-enough-of-the-lifestyle-programmes-already/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Groves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lecraic.com/?p=276#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Oh dear. All the warning signs are certainly there. 
Reality TV in a wide variety of forms has ruined British TV for years (from Big Brother to Wife Swap, The Apprentice to Location, Location, Location).
They&#039;ve all had a really damaging impact - greed is good; ignorance is bliss; aspirations are out of control and out of proportion to individual talent. It even impacts on the news - the BBC provides info-tainment these days, not news.
No-one is prepared to work for anything these days - they want it handed to them on a plate, &quot;like those folk on that reality show&quot;.
It even taints property shows - suddenly everyone aspires to an enormous &quot;family kitchen&quot; where everyone can sit around watching whoever cook their Nigella Lawson creation; they want en-suites for all 5 bedrooms; they want nice neighbours but they don&#039;t want road noise or any noise. They want to show off the size of their budget, but they don&#039;t want to mention the crippling 100% mortgage that is funding the lifestyle that the TV tells them they should have.
Anyway, what do I know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear. All the warning signs are certainly there.<br />
Reality TV in a wide variety of forms has ruined British TV for years (from Big Brother to Wife Swap, The Apprentice to Location, Location, Location).<br />
They&#8217;ve all had a really damaging impact &#8211; greed is good; ignorance is bliss; aspirations are out of control and out of proportion to individual talent. It even impacts on the news &#8211; the BBC provides info-tainment these days, not news.<br />
No-one is prepared to work for anything these days &#8211; they want it handed to them on a plate, &#8220;like those folk on that reality show&#8221;.<br />
It even taints property shows &#8211; suddenly everyone aspires to an enormous &#8220;family kitchen&#8221; where everyone can sit around watching whoever cook their Nigella Lawson creation; they want en-suites for all 5 bedrooms; they want nice neighbours but they don&#8217;t want road noise or any noise. They want to show off the size of their budget, but they don&#8217;t want to mention the crippling 100% mortgage that is funding the lifestyle that the TV tells them they should have.<br />
Anyway, what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

